When a major crisis occurs, institutions may commission ‘independent reviews’of what has happened. These often become the subject of press interest and the whole process can adversely affect the reputation of an institution.
On what principles should such reviews be conducted?
In the interests of protecting the institution’s reputation, the following good practice guidelines may be considered fundamental:
- Transparency, with a presumption that the evidence relied on will be published, in particular evidence submitted to the Inquiry or given to any hearings it may hold.
- The perceived independence of the Chairman and members of any panel conducting the inquiry
- The relevant expertise of the Chairman and members of any panel conducting the inquiry
Other things you may find useful
‘CAPSA and its implementation: report to the Audit Committee and the Board of Scrutiny, University of Cambridge’, set in motion after the expensive failure to ‘deliver’ of a new commitment accounting system,
The links below will take you back to the previous page and forward to the next one. If you want to read a sequence under one of the main headings, the first one will get you started.